| 
 
  One of the web’s best-known booksellers
                appears to have become bored with the idea. The trickle of other
                products has burgeoned into a torrent flooding from its pages.
                In the early days paddling among CDs and DVDs when trying to
                find books was not a particular problem. Overlap between the
                categories was not that great, so searching for a few words from
                the title usually found what you were looking for. But no more.
                Entering the words ‘easy
                RUP’* gets me the following
                product offerings (in order of appearance):  
          
                    
                       Safety cans under Scientific Supplies
                       Stirrups under Pet Toys and Supplies (horses are
                      pets?) 
                       More stirrups under Lifestyle and Gifts
                       Air beds and pumps under Lifestyle and Gifts  But no books. Okay, I did not say I was looking
                for a book, so I will give the site the benefit of the doubt.
                However, searching Books for ‘easy
                RUP’* yields  
          
                    
                       Three Magazine Subscriptions:
                        Quick and Easy Painting, Quickand Easy Crochet and Easy
                        Home Cooking (apparently not quick)
                       Three Toys: 24 pc puzzle bundle
                        pack, a 10’ x
                      30” Pool (it is biggerthan it sounds) plus a sand
                      and water table
                       Three Books including the one I was after   By now I am pretty annoyed. I specifically said I was looking
                for a book and I am still being offered products that fail to
                qualify even by the most generous definition. When I mention
                my indignation to friends and colleagues they relate it to the
                experience of being made to walk around supermarkets looking
                for the things you need to buy as opposed to the things the store
                wants to sell you. A resigned sigh usually follows.   But hang on; there are some problems with this line of thought.
                The first is that I was not just browsing or being asked to walk
                past shelves containing irrelevant products. I asked one of the
                world’s foremost book retailers for a title that they could
                easily find if they felt inclined (other sites I have tried find
                it first time). Instead, they chose to offer me very weak matches
                based on a few letters from the words I entered. Secondly, the ‘e’ in
                e-commerce is there for a reason. Web sites are not real stores
                and I know that I should not have to endure clumsy attempts
                at cross-selling before I have even become a customer. As readers
                of Paco Underhill ’s excellent Why We Buy will
                know, bricks-and-mortar retailing is a pretty complex business.
                Not surprisingly, there are many parallels in e-commerce, with
                a few techniques that web sites really excel at: adjacencies,
                add-ons and point-of-purchase sales have much more dynamic and
                relevant equivalents on the web; product information can be much
                more detailed than any printed carton while shopper recommendations
                and feature comparison facilities have almost no real-world equivalents.
                Notice that there is one important point these techniques have
                in common. They are passive (or can be). In most cases
                customers will have found a product they are interested in and
                can then choose whether to explore the myriad additional opportunities
                to part with their money that we are offering them. Customers
                who know exactly what they want or who are in a hurry can ignore
                these extra sections or links.   In contrast, techniques that actively prevent customers from
                finding what they are looking for are an electronic form of ‘bait-and-switch’:
                the site holds out the promise of providing a product they are
                interested in, but tries hard to sell them something else instead.
                This is a bad premise for improving customer loyalty. Customers’ confidence
                wanes with each irrelevant item that is offered and their frustration
                mounts with every unnecessary mouse click or key stroke. With
                so many passive e-commerce tools to choose from it is surprising
                that such a high-risk strategy has found its way to an e-commerce
                pioneer. I hope it does not catch on as a trend, or I will be
                buying my books at the butchers in future.  Footnote  *For The
                  Rational Unified Process Made Easy, Per Kroll and
                  Philippe Kruchten, 2003 (Addison-Wesley). The Rational Unified
                  Process is almost always referred to as ‘RUP’.
                  It is not a book I would recommend from a usability or user-centered
                  design point of view, but RUP is becoming increasing popular
                  as a software development method. (Also at Amazon.co.uk) BibliographyPaco Underhill (2000), Why
                    We Buy: The Science of Shopping,  Touchstone Books,
                    Carmichael, CA  (also at Amazon.co.uk) The AuthorWilliam Hudson is principal consultant for Syntagm Ltd, based
                near Oxford in the UK. His experience ranges from firmware to
                desktop applications, but he started by writing interactive software
                in the early 1970's. For the past ten years his focus has been
                user interface design, object-oriented design and HCI. Other free articles on user-centred design: www.syntagm.co.uk/design/articles.htm ©  2001-2005
                ACM. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here
                by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution.
                The definitive version was published in interactions,
                {Volume 10, Issue 5, September-October 2003} http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/889692.889707
				 |